Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 25684

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : OC28 - OC32 Full Version

Vascular Risk Factors and Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Migraine patients- A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64173.18431
Hari Nath Yadav, Sanjay Rao Kordcal, Manju Yadav, Bhawna Mahajan, Ashish Kumar Duggal, Poonam Narang, Meenakshi Thakkar, Debashish Chowdhury

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India 6. Director Professor, Department of Radiology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 7. Director Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Gure Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi, Delhi, India. 8. Director Professor, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Instit

Correspondence Address :
Debashish Chowdhury,
Director Professor, Department of Neurology, GB Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
E-mail: debashishchowdhury@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The available literature on vascular risk and endothelial dysfunction in patients with Chronic Migraine (CM) is limited. CM patients are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The present study aims to characterise the vascular risk and endothelial dysfunctions in CM patients and compare them with Healthy Controls (HC).

Aim: To assess the vascular risk factors and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in CM patients and compare them with healthy non-headache controls.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to January 2023 at the headache clinic of GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research in Delhi, India. The patients were diagnosed with CM using the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3) criteria. The patients were drug-naïve for preventive medications and did not have medication overuse headache. Clinical vascular risk factors such as Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), Body Mass Index (BMI), and Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) were measured. A battery of biochemical vascular risk factors, including serum C-reactive protein, leptin, insulin, fasting and post-prandial glucose, Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, lipoprotein-A, pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (pro-BNP), and serum biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction like Intercellular Adhesion Molecules-1 (ICAM-1), Myeloperoxidase (MPO), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumour Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-alpha), Asymmetric Dimethyl Arginine (ADMA), fibrinogen, and von Willebrand’s factor were measured in all patients during the interictal period. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0, and the Mann-Whitney U test, student’s t-test, and Chi-square tests were applied.

Results: Thirty-two patients with CM and thirty-two non-headache healthy subjects were included in the study (age 30.6±8.8 years; 29 females and 3 males) vs. (31.7±7.9 years; 19 females and 13 males, respectively). Compared to HC, CM patients had significantly higher DBP (81.0±8.0 mmHg vs. 66.2±6.2 mmHg; p<0.001). Among the biochemical parameters, CM patients had higher post-prandial blood sugar (mg/dL) (140.2±10.7 vs. 136.6±7.0; p=0.021), HbA1c (%) (5.8±0.8 vs. 5.6±0.4; p=0.034), serum cholesterol (mg/dL) (146.9±36.2 vs. 131±20.8), and Triglyceride (TG) levels (mg/dL) (93.2±10.8 vs. 88.5±13.0; p=0.001) compared to HCs. Among the biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction studied, levels of ICAM-1 (pg/mL) (4.5±3.8 vs. 1.3±0.62; p<0.001), MPO (pg/mL) (415.4±266.0 vs. 108.9±141.4; p=0.001), IL-6 (pg/mL) (10.8±4.9 vs. 4.2±1.5; p<0.001), and ADMA (ng/mL) (32.6±28.3 vs. 23.5±22.1; p=0.008) were higher in the CM group compared to non-headache controls.

Conclusion: This study found that patients with CM have significantly higher vascular risk and evidence of endothelial dysfunction compared to healthy non-headache controls. The significantly elevated biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction may possibly be related to persistent neurogenic inflammation in CM and require further exploration through larger studies.

Keywords

International classification of headache disorders-3, Inflammation, Intercellular adhesion molecule-1

Migraine is a common disabling disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of headache attacks. It is the third most prevalent medical condition and the second most disabling neurological disorder in the world (1). Based on the frequency of headache attacks, the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3) recognises two types of migraine, namely Episodic Migraine (EM) and CM (2). CM is defined as a headache occurring on ≥15 days/month for more than three months, having features of migraine headache on at least eight days/month. CM is a highly disabling condition and is often associated with acute medication overuse. Risk factors for conversion from episodic to CM include female gender, obesity, acute migraine medication overuse, inappropriate and ineffective use of acute treatment, depression, and stressful life events (3). CM sufferers are more likely to be older, have a higher BMI, have lower educational levels, have lower household income, and are less likely to be employed than EM sufferers (4).

Various studies in the last two decades have shown that migraine patients also have an increased vascular risk profile, namely obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and various markers of increased atherosclerosis compared to the general population (5),(6). A large meta-analysis of a population cohort showed that female migraineurs and those with aura have an increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke (6).

It is postulated that CM patients, who share a higher proportion of vascular risk factors than EM, may be more predisposed to vascular risk (4),(7). However, the mechanisms underlying the association between migraine and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders remain unknown. Possible mechanisms that have been postulated include enhanced atherosclerosis, unknown genetic factors, inflammatory arteriopathy due to recurrent neuroinflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. However, only a handful of studies have comprehensively assessed the clinical and biochemical risk factors of increased atherosclerosis and the serum biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in CM patients.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and biochemical vascular risk factors and the serum biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction using a battery of tests in patients with CM and compare them with healthy non-headache controls.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted from October 2021 to January 2023. The subjects were consecutive migraine patients attending the Headache Clinic at GB Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER) in Delhi. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC: GIPMER/ (83/01/2021/342), and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Chronic Migraine (CM) Patients

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 to 50 years who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for CM as laid down by ICHD-3 (2), and those who were drug-naive for preventive treatments were included in this study as cases.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with other secondary headaches, including medication overuse headache, as well as pregnant or lactating individuals, those on chronic anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory drugs, statins, antihypertensives, nitrates, or anti-epileptic drugs, and females using oral contraceptives were excluded from the study.

Healthy Non-headache Controls

Inclusion criteria: Healthy individuals without headaches were included from hospital staff, friends of the patients, and attendants of admitted neurology patients (subjects with a history of episodic tension-type headache were allowed, but they did not have an episode of headache in the last three months).

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with acute or chronic painful conditions and/or those using anti-inflammatory agents on a regular basis, as well as pregnant or lactating individuals, and those using oral contraceptives were excluded from the controls of the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated based on estimates from previous studies on vascular risk associations, specifically IL-6 levels (435.28±19.04 pg/mL vs. 259.00±32.92 pg/mL), CRP levels (718.11±42.71 mg/dL vs. 514.21±47.04 mg/dL), and TNF-alpha levels (651.04±26.99 pg/mL vs. 448.95±43.89 pg/mL) for chronic migraineurs and controls, respectively (7). Assuming 80% power and a 5% alpha error, with a 1:1 ratio of two groups, the sample size was estimated to be 32 patients in each group.

Procedure

Assessment: All patients were evaluated using a detailed structured proforma that covered all aspects of the clinical characteristics of headache. This included the duration of disease onset, attack duration, attack frequency, location, character, pre-monitory symptoms, systemic symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia, as well as clinical autonomic symptoms/signs, triggers, motor and psychological symptoms during headache, and postdrome. Detailed family history for headache was also obtained. Relevant biochemical tests (haemogram, liver function tests, kidney function tests, thyroid function tests) and radiological tests were performed to exclude secondary causes. The severity of pain was rated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The impact of headache was assessed using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and headache-related disability was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS). A baseline screening headache diary for one month was utilised before inclusion in the study.

Clinical vascular risk factors: A battery of clinical vascular risk factors, such as SBP, DBP, ABI, BMI, and WHR, were measured. The auscultatory method of Blood Pressure (BP) measurement with a properly calibrated and validated sphygmomanometer was used. Subjects were instructed to sit comfortably in a chair for 29at least five minutes with their arm supported at heart level. The appropriate cuff size (bladder length 80% and width at least 40% of arm circumference) was used to ensure accuracy. The systolic BP was defined as the appearance of the first sound (Korotkoff phase 1), and the diastolic BP was defined as the disappearance of the sound (Korotkoff phase 5). Additionally, resting brachial and ankle blood pressures were measured in the supine position on both extremities, five minutes apart, and the mean pressure was recorded to calculate the ABI. For BMI, height was measured in centimeters using a wall-mounted stadiometer, and weight (kg) was determined using a weighing scale with a minimum measuring unit of 100 gm. BMI was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Waist Circumference (WC) was measured midway between the inferior margin of the last rib and the crest of the ileum, and Hip Circumference (HC) was measured around the pelvis at the point of maximum protrusion of the buttocks, both in a horizontal plane without compressing the soft tissues. WC and HC were recorded to the nearest cm, and WHR was defined as the ratio of WC to HC.

Biochemical vascular risk factors: Venous blood (10 mL) was collected under aseptic conditions by experienced laboratory technicians from the participants after an eight-hour fast. It was allowed to clot at 25°C for 30 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 20 minutes. Subsequently, the serum was separated, and aliquots were prepared. The following biochemical vascular risk factors were measured: high-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) using a fully automatic autoanalyser c501 Hitachi/Roche (Germany), fasting serum leptin using Enzyme Linked Immuno-sorbent Assay (ELISA) from Mannheim, Germany, fasting adiponectin using ELISA, fasting serum insulin using electrochemiluminescence with commercially available kits e411 provided by Elecsys, Roche Diagnostics, fasting and post-prandial glucose (2 hours after 75 gm of glucose), HbA1c, lipid profile including serum cholesterol, Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides (TG), and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Lipoprotein (a) [LP(a)], and proB-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP).

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction: Venous blood (10 mL) was collected under aseptic conditions by experienced laboratory technicians from the participants after an eight-hour fast. It was allowed to clot at 25°C for 30 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 20 minutes. Subsequently, the serum was separated, and aliquots were prepared. A battery of biomarkers of endothelial function was measured, including serum levels of ICAM-1, MPO, IL-6, TNF-alpha, ADMA, fibrinogen (measured using Elitepro Instrumentation Laboratory), and von Willebrand’s factor (all measured using commercially available ELISA kits).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package (version 25). Categorical data were summarised as frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were summarised as means, and Student’s t-test was used to compare the means. Non-parametric analyses, such as the Mann-Whitney U test, were used for parameters that were not normally distributed. Post-hoc Bonferroni adjustments were made for multiple testing. The Chi-square test with Yates correction and Fisher’s-exact test were used to compare proportions between the groups. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Sixty-four subjects, including thirty-two patients with CM and thirty-two non-headache healthy subjects, were studied. The mean age of the patients with CM was 30.6±8.8 years, compared to 31.7±7.9 years in the non-headache group (p=0.594). There were 29 females (91%) in the CM group, compared to 19 females (59.4%) in the non-headache group (p=0.004). The age and sex distribution is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

The headache burden of the CM patients is presented in (Table/Fig 2). On average, the CM patients experienced 23.4±4.7 headache days per month, of which 17.9±4.6 were migraine days. They also had significant headache impact and disability, as indicated by their mean HIT-6 and MIDAS scores.

Compared to the non-headache group, CM patients had significantly higher DBP (81.0±8.0 vs. 66.2±6.2; p<0.001). They also had higher BMI, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (27.2±2.3 vs. 24.9±1.8; p=0.099). These results are shown in (Table/Fig 3).

Among the biochemical parameters, CM patients had higher post-prandial blood sugar (mg/dL) (140.2±10.7 vs. 136.6±7.0; p=0.021), HbA1c (%) (5.8±0.8 vs. 5.6±0.4; p=0.034), serum cholesterol (mg/dL) (146.9±36.2 vs. 131±20.8), and TG levels (mg/dL) (93.2±10.8 vs. 88.5±13.0; p=0.001) compared to the non-headache group. The comparison of the biochemical vascular risk factors between the two groups is shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Among the biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction that were studied, levels of ICAM-1 (pg/mL) (4.5±3.8 vs. 1.3±0.62; p<0.001), MPO (pg/mL) (415.4±266.0 vs. 108.9±141.4; p=0.001), IL-6 (pg/mL) (10.8±4.9 vs. 4.2±1.5; p<0.001), and ADMA (ng/mL) (32.6±28.3 vs. 23.5±22.1; p=0.008) were higher in the CM group compared to the non-headache controls (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

It was found that patients with CM had significantly higher vascular risk, along with evidence of endothelial dysfunction, compared to non-headache healthy controls. Patients with CM had higher DBP, post-prandial blood sugar, HbA1c, serum cholesterol, and TG levels. These vascular risk factors have been strongly associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (5),(8),(9).

Previously, Mathew NT reported that patients with chronic daily headache, originally transformed from EM, had a higher likelihood of hypertension (10). Bigal ME et al., conducted a randomised case-control study to identify factors associated with induction and transformation from episodic to CM (11). They found a strong association between hypertension and CM, with and without analgesic overuse, when comparing the study group to EM and chronic post-traumatic headache. In contrast, Huang Q et al., found that the frequency of elevated BP was not higher in CM patients compared to the non-CM group (12). They suggested that analgesic overuse maybe the reason for the higher frequency of elevated BP in patients with chronic daily headaches and its subtypes. However, patients with CM and analgesic overuse were excluded from their study. Interestingly, several population-based studies, such as those by Shechter A et al., Gudmundsson LS et al., and the HUNT study by Winsvold BS et al., have also found that DBP is higher in migraine patients compared to non-migraine controls (13),(14),(15). Furthermore, in a recent study by Ramusino MC et al., hypertension was proposed to have contributed to the chronic evolution of headache through mechanisms shared with migraine, such as vascular tone alteration and autonomic dysregulation (16). It is important to note that although DBP was higher among migraineurs, it still fell within the normal range according to JNC8 guidelines (17). Hence, clinically overt hypertension may be related to disease duration and the extent of vascular risk that accumulates over time. Supporting this argument, some longitudinal population-based studies have found that migraine patients are more likely to develop clinical hypertension, particularly diastolic hypertension, over time (18),(19).

Among the studied biochemical vascular risk factors, previous studies have demonstrated altered glucose metabolism and abnormal lipid profile levels in migraineurs compared to controls. Thus, the present results are consistent with these previous studies (20),(21),(22),(23),(24). A recent review article by Islam MR and Nyholt DR found that the comorbidity of migraine and glucose-related traits may have complex pathogenic mechanisms, including impaired glucose homeostasis, insulin resistance, reduced cerebrovascular reactivity, abnormal brain metabolism, shared genetic factors, neurotransmitters, and sex hormones (25). Furthermore, several studies have found a bidirectional link between migraine and insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

Similarly, a meta-analysis of observational studies on serum lipid abnormalities in migraine was conducted by Liampas I et al., which included 17 studies (16 case-control and 1 cross-sectional) (26). The results were compatible with higher LDL-C levels in migraine patients compared to healthy controls (12 studies, Mean Difference (MD)=10.4 mg/dL, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=(1.6, 19.2)). Similarly, higher total cholesterol levels were found in migraine patients (14 studies, MD=10.6 mg/dL, 95% CI=(1.8, 19.3)), as well as higher TG levels (15 studies, MD=11.8 mg/dL, 95% CI=(3.6, 20.0)). However, HDL-C concentrations did not differ between the two groups. Sub-group analyses and comparisons between migraine with aura and migraine without aura individuals showed no significant differences. However, direct comparisons between CM patients and controls were not presented.

The mechanism underlying the association between migraine and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders is currently unknown. Various mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction, have been postulated to account for the increased risk of vascular diseases in migraine patients (26),(27). Broadly speaking, endothelial dysfunction primarily results in impaired endothelial-dependent vasodilation, due to a decrease in the bioavailability of vasodilating factors and an increase in endothelium-derived vasoconstrictors (28). Additionally, endothelial activation, characterised by a proinflammatory and procoagulatory environment, enhances atherogenesis and vascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction can be assessed through serum biomarkers and vascular reactivity studies. However, recent studies on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in migraine patients have yielded conflicting results (29),(30).

In the present study, among the biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, ICAM-1, MPO, IL-6, and ADMA levels were significantly elevated in CM patients compared to non-headache controls. ICAM-1 is a cell surface glycoprotein expressed on endothelial, immune, and epithelial cells and belongs to the Ig superfamily (31). It plays a role in leukocyte transendothelial migration and in innate and adaptive responses to inflammation. MPO is found in the aniline blue granules of myeloid cells (neutrophils and monocytes) (32). It plays a role in phagocytosis and microorganism killing. Reactive oxygen species derived from MPO promote the development of tissue damage and disease. MPO is also involved in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. IL-6 is released by macrophages, B and T-cells, eosinophils, and basophils and plays a role in the induction and control of acute phase protein synthesis, stimulation of haematopoiesis, stimulation of antibody production by B-cells, neutrophil activation, macrophage maturation, and increased expression of IL-1 and TNF-α (33). ADMA is formed through the proteolysis of methylated residues of arginine and causes endothelial dysfunction due to low levels of NO (34). High plasma ADMA levels have a strong positive correlation with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. These biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction have been found to be elevated in migraine patients in general, but not many studies have specifically explored the differences between CM and HCs. A recent study by Togha M et al., showed that serum levels of IL-6, CRP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in subjects with CM compared to EM and controls (7).

The present study found significantly elevated levels of multiple biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (4 out of 7 measures) in CM patients using a battery of tests. This raises the possibility of their role in the increased vascular risk factors observed in CM patients (35). The endothelium modulates vascular function and structure primarily through the production of nitric oxide, which protects the vasculature against the development of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Endothelial dysfunction is associated with hypertension, contributing to inflammation in the vascular wall of resistance arteries, as well as increased lipoprotein oxidation, smooth muscle cell proliferation, extracellular matrix deposition, cell adhesion, and thrombus formation in conducting arteries (35). Similarly, abnormalities in glucose metabolism and lipid abnormalities have been linked to endothelial dysfunction (36),(37).

It is noteworthy that the absolute values of various parameters that were estimated were mostly within normal cut-offs. Therefore, while the comparisons between the two groups showed statistical significance, the clinical significance of these findings remains uncertain.

Limitation(s)

The present study cohort had a shorter duration of CM, which may have influenced the results. Additionally, there was a significantly higher proportion of females in the CM group compared to the controls. However, it is known that CM has a significantly higher female preponderance (38).

Furthermore, the exact pathophysiology of CM remains uncertain, although atypical pain processing, central sensitisation, cortical hyperexcitability, and neurogenic inflammation have been implicated in its development (38). In this context, the findings of the present study, which showed significantly elevated biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction possibly related to persistent neurogenic inflammation in CM, are important and warrant further exploration through larger studies.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest a higher occurrence of biomarkers in CM patients compared to non-headache HCs. Therefore, when treating a CM patient, it is important to assess vascular risk factors through a thorough history, clinical examination, and relevant biochemical investigations.

References

1.
Vos T, Allen C, Arora M. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545-602. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders. 3rd ed. Cephalalgia; 2018. Pp. 1-211.
3.
May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: Risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):455-64. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Lipton RB, Manack Adams A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. A comparison of the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study and American migraine prevalence and prevention (AMPP) study: Demographics and headache-relateddisability. Headache. 2016;56(8):1280-89. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Schürks M, Rist PM, Bigal ME, Buring JE, Lipton RB, Kurth T. Migraine and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009;339:b3914. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3914. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Mahmoud AN, Mentias A, Elgendy AY, Qazi A, Barakat AF, Saad M, et al. Migraine and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: A meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies including 1 152 407 subjects. BMJ (Open). 2018;8(3):e020498. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Togha M, RazeghiJahromi S, Ghorbani Z, Ghaemi A, Rafiee P. Evaluation of inflammatorystate in migraineurs: A case-control study. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;19(S1):83-90. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Cook NR, Benseñor IM, Lotufo PA, Lee IM, Skerrett PJ, Chown MJ, et al. Migraine and coronary heart disease in women and men. Headache. 2002;42(8):715-27. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Øie LR, Kurth T, Gulati S, Dodick DW. Migraine and risk of stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(6):593-604. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mathew NT. Pathophysiology of chronic migraine and mode of action of preventive medications. Headache. 2011;51(s2):84-92. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bigal ME, Sheftell FD, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, Lipton RB. Chronic daily headache: Identification of factors associated with induction and transformation. Headache. 2002;42(7):575-81. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Huang Q, Li W, Li N, Wang J, Tan G, Chen L, et al. Elevated blood pressure and analgesic overuse in chronic daily headache: An outpatient clinic-based study from China. J Headache Pain. 2013;14(1):51. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Shechter A, Stewart WF, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB. Migraine and autonomic nervous system function a population-based, case-control study. Neurology. 2002;58(3):422-27.[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Gudmundsson LS, Scher AI, Aspelund T, Eliasson JH, Johannsson M, Thorgeirsson G, et al. Migraine with aura and risk of cardiovascular and al cause mortality in men and women: Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c3966. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3966. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Winsvold BS, Hagen K, Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Holmen J, Zwart JA. Headache, migraine and cardiovascular risk factors: The HUNT study. EurJ Neurol. 2011;18(3):504-11. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Ramusino MC, Perini G, Capelli M, Vaghi G, Fogari R, Bosone D, et al. Potential contribution of hypertension to evolution of chronicmigraine and relatedmechanisms. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2022;36(3-4):221-28. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019. 2018;139(25):e1082-143. [crossref]
18.
Rist P, Winter A, Buring J, Sesso H, Kurth T. Migraine and the risk of incidenthypertension among women. Neurology. 2017;88;S15(006):S15-006.
19.
Entonen AH, Suominen SB, Korkeila K, Mäntyselkä PT, Sillanmäki LH, Ojanlatva A, et al. Migraine predicts hypertension-a cohort study of the Finnish working-age population. EurJ Public Health. 2014;24(2):244-48. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Venkatesan Rangan DT, Bedi M, Varshney VP, Jayabal M, Subramaniam V. Comparative study of lipid profile between episodic migraineurs and healthy volunteers International Journal. 2015;4(3):327. [crossref]
21.
Janoska M, Chora? z? ka K, Domitrz I. Migraine frequency and its association with dyslipidemia in women. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2015;49(2):95-98. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gruber HJ, Bernecker C, Pailer S, Fauler G, Horejsi R, Möller R, et al. Hyperinsulinemia in migraineurs is associated with nitric oxide stress. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(5):593-98. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hamed SA, Ezz-El-Deen ME, Abdou MA. Migraine in patients with metabolic syndrome: Is there a relationship to leptin? Metabolomics. 2012;2(114):2153-0769.
24.
Fava A, Pirritano D, Consoli D, Plastino M, Casalinuovo F, Cristofaro S, et al. Chronic migraine in women is associated with insulin resistance: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(2):267-72. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Islam MR, Nyholt DR. Glucose-relatedtraits and risk of migraine-A potential mechanism and treatment consideration. Genes. 2022;13(5):730. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Liampas I, Mylonas KS, Brotis A, Dervenis P, Siokas V, Mentis AA, et al. Serum lipid abnormalities in migraine: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Headache. 2021;61(1):44-59. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Tietjen GE. Migraine as a systemic vasculopathy. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(9):987-96. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction: A marker of atherosclerotic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(2):168-75. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Perko D, Pretnar-Oblak J, Å abovic? M, Zvan B, Zaletel M. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(6):654-60. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Vernieri F, Moro L, Altamura C, Palazzo P, Antonelli Incalzi R, Rossini PM, et al. Patients with migraine with aura have increased flow mediated dilation. BMC Neurol. 2010;10:18. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Bui TM, Wiesolek HL, Sumagin R. ICAM-1: A master regulator of cellular responses in inflammation, injury resolution, and tumourigenesis. J Leukoc Biol. 2020S;108(3):787-99. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Li J, Cao T, Wei Y, Zhang N, Zhou Z, Wang Z, et al. A review of novel cardiac biomarkers in acute or chronic cardiovascular diseases: The role of soluble ST2 (sST2), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and procalcitonin (PCT). Dis Markers. 2021;2021:6258865. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Curfs JH, Meis JF, Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA. A primer on cytokines: Sources, receptors, effects, and inducers. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(4):742-80. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Drenjancevic I, Jukic I, Stupin A, Cosic A, Stupin M, Selthofer-Relatic K. The markers of endothelialactivation. Endothelial dysfunction-old concepts and new challenges [internet]; 2018. Doi: 10.5772/intechopen.74671. [crossref]
35.
Gallo G, Volpe M, Savoia C. Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: Current concepts and clinical implications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:798958. Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.798958. eCollection 2021. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Kaur R, Kaur M, Singh J. Endothelial dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Molecular insights and therapeutic strategies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):121. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Malekmohammad K, Bezsonov EE, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Role of lipid accumulation and inflammation in atherosclerosis: Focus on molecular and cellular mechanisms. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:707529. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Mungoven TJ, Henderson LA, Meylakh N. Chronic migrainepathophysiology and treatment: A review of current perspectives. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021;2:705276.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64173.18431

Date of Submission: Mar 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 23, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 03, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com